What I use
About this site
- "Freelancing science" is a blog about biology in silico, data visualization and open science. Written by Paweł Szczęsny.
- Contact: pawel at FreelancingScience dot com
-
Original content of this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License, unless stated otherwise.
Other sites and projects
- New home site - Circle of complexity
Most popular posts
Twitter Updates
Error: Please make sure the Twitter account is public.
- bioblogs bioinformatics Biological engineering Career Clipped Comments Community Data mining Dump-all Education Fun Imaginary nanodevice Money open-science Papers Proteins PubMed Research Research skills Science and Art Secretion system Services Software Structural biology Structure prediction Synthetic biology Visualization
Shared items
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
GR starred items (not necessarily scientific)
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
My science-related images
Archives
Bug tracking systems in science
I’m not going to describe painful process of correcting entries in biological databases or errors in publications when one is not the author – we all know how difficult and unrewarding it is. All major databases contain wrong entries – I see misannotated (or nonexistent) genes in Genbank, artificial domains in PFAM or poorly solved structures in PDB. It’s even worse in publications, where across the whole spectrum of journals I see errors which in theory shouldn’t slip through peer review (this includes such prominent publishers like NPG).
One of the best idea I heard that addressed this issue was to build a bug tracking system (I would like to give credit to the author, but I cannot find the source; wasn’t that one of biobloggers?). It’s simple and efficient. Something is wrong? Fill a bug report. It would be linking to the original entry, would be available for aggregation (for example to track report’s author activity), and possibly could be closed by somebody else than database maintainers or authors if it’s wrong. Because it would be external to all databases, maybe it could grow to provide “community corrected” versions of these databases?
What do you think? How useful such system could be?
Posted by Pawel Szczesny on April 18, 2008 in Comments, Community, Software
Tags: bioinformatics, bug tracking, NPG, science