<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HMMER3 testing notes &#8211; my skills are (finally) becoming obsolete</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freelancingscience.com/2009/04/22/hmmer3-testing-notes-my-skills-are-finally-becoming-obsolete/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freelancingscience.com/2009/04/22/hmmer3-testing-notes-my-skills-are-finally-becoming-obsolete/</link>
	<description>visualization, protein science, open science and freelancing science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 14:02:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pawel Szczesny</title>
		<link>http://freelancingscience.com/2009/04/22/hmmer3-testing-notes-my-skills-are-finally-becoming-obsolete/#comment-745</link>
		<dc:creator>Pawel Szczesny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 08:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freelancingscience.com/?p=399#comment-745</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the interesting comment dr Bateman, I&#039;ve indeed missed the publication about SIMPRO. 

As for my sequence comparison benchmark, I&#039;ll prepare a separate post about that, but in short: it&#039;s not a large scale benchmark - more of a CASP-like (I have access to a few structures that are not yet published). Also, I don&#039;t mind false positives (even in cases I don&#039;t know the answer I usually can filter these out by looking at the alignment), so it&#039;s very likely that I sort tools in different order that most of other people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the interesting comment dr Bateman, I&#8217;ve indeed missed the publication about SIMPRO. </p>
<p>As for my sequence comparison benchmark, I&#8217;ll prepare a separate post about that, but in short: it&#8217;s not a large scale benchmark &#8211; more of a CASP-like (I have access to a few structures that are not yet published). Also, I don&#8217;t mind false positives (even in cases I don&#8217;t know the answer I usually can filter these out by looking at the alignment), so it&#8217;s very likely that I sort tools in different order that most of other people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexbateman</title>
		<link>http://freelancingscience.com/2009/04/22/hmmer3-testing-notes-my-skills-are-finally-becoming-obsolete/#comment-744</link>
		<dc:creator>alexbateman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freelancingscience.com/?p=399#comment-744</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the interesting article.  I&#039;d be interested to read more about your sequence comparison benchmark.  I found that PRC outperformed HHsearch on my Pfam Clans benchmark [1].  You might also be interested to know about a recent publication that appeared to significantly improve the performance of HHsearch by looking at a network of matches [2].

References

1. Bateman A, Finn RD. SCOOP: a simple method for identification of novel protein superfamily relationships. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(7):809-814. 
2. Jung I, Kim D. SIMPRO: simple protein homology detection method by using indirect signals. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(6):729-735.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the interesting article.  I&#8217;d be interested to read more about your sequence comparison benchmark.  I found that PRC outperformed HHsearch on my Pfam Clans benchmark [1].  You might also be interested to know about a recent publication that appeared to significantly improve the performance of HHsearch by looking at a network of matches [2].</p>
<p>References</p>
<p>1. Bateman A, Finn RD. SCOOP: a simple method for identification of novel protein superfamily relationships. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(7):809-814.<br />
2. Jung I, Kim D. SIMPRO: simple protein homology detection method by using indirect signals. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(6):729-735.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Karpinski</title>
		<link>http://freelancingscience.com/2009/04/22/hmmer3-testing-notes-my-skills-are-finally-becoming-obsolete/#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Karpinski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freelancingscience.com/?p=399#comment-735</guid>
		<description>I was fascinated to discover the link from several unique forms of an apparently unrelated gene in a few families to subsequent muscular distrophy. The middle of the RNA became &quot;sticky&quot; and hybridized with RNA of a signaling protein affecting expression of a hundred or so other genes which are related to the distrophy. Accidental creation of a double helix of RNA acting as RNAi. Perfectly sensible once you think of it, but weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was fascinated to discover the link from several unique forms of an apparently unrelated gene in a few families to subsequent muscular distrophy. The middle of the RNA became &#8220;sticky&#8221; and hybridized with RNA of a signaling protein affecting expression of a hundred or so other genes which are related to the distrophy. Accidental creation of a double helix of RNA acting as RNAi. Perfectly sensible once you think of it, but weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
